The beneficiaries of enmity
originally published in "virtual columnist" the Bogota daily El Espectador ( www.elespectador.com )
of the complete explanatory ray traced in qualified columnists El Espectador (week 10 to 16 June 2005) on the London attacks, lucid approach excels the Pulitzer Prize 2002, Thomas Friedman (noting that the Muslim religious authorities still do not condemn bin Laden, and said that the shock will continue until the Muslim people and their spiritual leaders decide to condemn and isolate the extremists who stay inside), and likewise appears fragmentary argumentation and political sociologist Eugenio Gómez Martínez when point-after record that "There is no justification" for the facts, that according to the jihadist fanatics "Spain was cruel and overwhelming against the Islamists in time of the Catholic Monarchs" ... In return we should mention the nearly eight centuries of Islamic invasion from English soil after 711, where the Berbers led by Tariq ibn-Ziyad crossed Gibraltar to subdue the Iberian Peninsula and defeated the Visigoth king Rodrigo, and 1492 when Boabdil surrendered in Granada ... So the penalties of partial exposures, like those of many Western intellectuals and historians hostile to George W. Bush and U.S. world dominance, to denounce the abuse that American invasion of Iraqi soil defined it as an affront to the venerable Muslim culture there seated (without referring to, in 641, the ancestors of those same venerable Muslims had in turn Mesopotamia attacked where today is Iraq and destroyed the Persian Sassanid empire province then flourished there) ... All because the fashion is to pose as anti-imperialist sins found only in the historical role of the Catholic Church and describe the brutal excesses of the Crusades started in 1095-forgetting, though, that 363 years before these episodes, the army of Charles Martel stopped at Poitiers the Islamic assault on Europe ("the" crescent "?)-, Who says you have been other circumstances, a possible Muslim superpower would be better arbiter of planetary destiny of what is now the United States? Anyway
historical find excuses for blaming one side or the other absurdity is unfortunate, especially when what matters is not which threw the first stones, but how to get both continue to refrain from throwing, there is much in common between the West and Islam to allow the imposition of apartheid vision of fierce radical minorities. As noted last year the British journalist Jason Burke, Al Qaeda is more an ideology than an organization (according to him, the Arabic word 'Qaeda', which translates as "home base" as a "method" or "precept" understood by suicide bombers in this sense) ... The big threat is that "al-Qaedaism" spread throughout the world as criminal factions generating effect step-by-one action and reaction "to" al-Qaedaism "Western counterpart. Therefore, the authorities would do well to seek out potential beneficiaries world de la enemistad entre musulmanes y cristianos, perversos interesados, a uno y otro lado del espectro religioso y cultural, en fomentar la discordia para acrecentar su poder o enriquecerse con ello (ayatollahs, fabricantes de armas, incluso vendedores de millonarias pólizas de seguros... la lista de sospechosos es considerable). Esos nefastos, y aún anónimos incitadores, serían la versión global de aquellos bullangueros que en los colegios gritan “dele, dele, dele” al primer conato de riña entre compañeros animando a los eventuales contendores a agredirse, quienquiera que sean y sin saber siquiera el motivo del altercado.
Los alcances del asunto escalofrían, bastaría una explosión durante mass pilgrimage to Mecca, or in a crowded papal blessing in St. Peter's Square in Rome (especially if people got behind it sectarian interests to convince the believers of the faith that the perpetrators violated embody the sense of the faithful the other) to open wounds that would take millennia to heal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment